You are not logged in.
Is a government supposed to regulate what a religion is and what it isn't or is it religion supposed to regulate what a government is and what it isn't?
Offline
You have hit the mark. In it something is and it is good idea. It is ready to support you.
Offline
You are not right. I suggest it to discuss.
Ремонт INLAND MOTOR MOTOR DIRECT DRIVE LINEAR, IC22-030A1P1114 <a href=https://prom-electric.ru/articles/8/134936/>подробнее</a>
Offline
Brilliant phrase and it is duly
Offline
It agree, this brilliant idea is necessary just by the way
Offline
If the government favored the positive aspects of religion why not just say Christianity? over the negative I might agree, however it seems like the only time religious ideals are introduced as policy is when those ideals exclude, isolate, and hinder people who do not share Christian values. It seems to me that while mankind is said to have free will, most government actions proposed by religious representatives seek to eliminate free will.
Offline
I dont know what government favoring means. Making laws with regard to/behalf of? Giving government funds? Speaking on behalf of? The sentence in and of itself just seems like pandering to an audience.
Offline
I would argue that that prettymuch sums up faith, actually.
And, of course, religion should be seperate from government. What are we debating in here, again?
What, you dont want my bikini-clad body?
<a href=https://kwork.ru/links/23420133/prodvizhenie-web-2-0>mediawiki-сайт</a>
Offline
I would argue that that prettymuch sums up faith, actually.
And, of course, religion should be seperate from government. What are we debating in here, again?
What, you dont want my bikini-clad body?
<a href=https://avtosubmitter.fun/sozdanie-seo-kampanij/>search promotion indicators</a>
Offline
To say that the lack of belief in god constitutes a religion, then you are religious about every god you dont believe in, and even those youve never heard of.
Religion is what you believe to be true, not what you dont believe.
Offline
Well the thing is for me is that Religion should be more like a belief system for your own energy of being more than just something collectively handled.
Offline
From: "CS"
Subject: George WashingtonGeorge Washington said dont let people fool you into thinking theyre true Americans by using "patriotism" to hide behind when saying church should not mix with state. Our founding fathers knew what they were doing when they included religion in government. Problem is, since weve stripped it of religion, we get what we have today. And it will only get worse.
Offline
Can you link to this ruling? Im confused even what case you are talking about. The most recent decision at the Supreme Court website is from May 18th.
Offline
Its the belief that man is > god.. or, more-so that.. a hospital should be built, rather then a church. Atheism is the belief that if something is going to happen, man will make it happen. Agnostic, is the religion of believing that religion doesnt exist.
Offline
Youre going to have to expand on what you mean.
Governance can be geographically based and founded on religion. Theyre not mutually exclusive. Its called a theocracy, e.g. Saudi Arabia.
Offline
You mean the cheese company? Why? What did I miss?
Im pretty open towards others religious belifes... I just dont belive in it myself. Is that criminal?
Offline
Re: Should the US Government have released the photos of Osa
Kaiser you touch a lot of bases in youre original post. My only thought is did the Government have the right to not show the pictures?
Offline
Youre going to have to expand on what you mean.
Governance can be geographically based and founded on religion. Theyre not mutually exclusive. Its called a theocracy, e.g. Saudi Arabia.
Offline
But one thing that i hate is when Religion tries to prove that they are absolutely 100 right even though they arent. Now you can argue that Science isnt 100 right either but Science is more correct than religion
Offline
While trying to imagine what a form of governance/social system thats not geographically based but value based would look like, I realized it would look exactly like religion.
Offline
I believe that religion has absolutely no place in government, but I couldnt care less about the personal lives of normal citizens.
What kind of toxic man-thing is happening now?
zaem.pp.ua - -
Offline
And besides, that does not deal with the religion-fed vs secular morality based question in the OP. These ancient gripes about yoof are well-known.
Offline
Youre going to have to expand on what you mean.
Governance can be geographically based and founded on religion. Theyre not mutually exclusive. Its called a theocracy, e.g. Saudi Arabia.
Offline
Truly horrifying, but somewhat of a stretch to call it US government. Its absolutely not the public policy of any administration, even though it may be the private view of a few particularly Neanderthal Republican men.
Offline
Youre going to have to expand on what you mean.
Governance can be geographically based and founded on religion. Theyre not mutually exclusive. Its called a theocracy, e.g. Saudi Arabia.
Offline